12 Angry Men

Eleven jurors are convinced that the defendant is guilty of murder. The twelfth has no doubt of his innocence. How can this one man steer the others toward the same conclusion? It's a case of seemingly overwhelming evidence against a teenager accused of killing his father in ~~one of the best pictures ever made~~ Nominated for three Academy Awards®. (Note: licensees are to use the embedded videos for preview purposes only and they should obtain full-length versions for their public performance needs.)

12 Angry Men (1957)

1. Juror advises consideration before condemning boy to death

2. Juror admits abusing son

3. Men believe people from slums are worthless

4. Evidence proves testimony possible

5. Man respected for going against crowd

6. Bored jurors flippantly play game

7. Insignificant old man lies to get attention

8. Juror showdown

9. Man encourages group to disagree respectfully

10. Man's experience gives him unique perspective

11. Bigoted man alienates fellow jurors

12. Minor details cast doubt on testimony

13. Jury finally agrees on "Not Guilty"